Jump to content
duckservices-logo
Duck's Services - #1 Provider
Experience Gaming
to the fullest with
Duck's Services

What are the differences between our DMA aiming devices?


Recommended Posts

  • 1. Administrators

KM Box (Net / B+ / B Pro) vs Makcu – Guide

KM Box was the original go-to for spoofing mouse and keyboard input, but it’s fallen behind in reliability and detection safety—especially when compared to newer solutions like Makcu.


KM Box (Net / B+ / B Pro)

What is it?
A hardware aim assist device originally used for spoofing mouse and keyboard inputs. The Net model is the newer version, while B+ is the older, Python-supported dual-core units.

Pros – Net:

  • Compact with four USB ports.

  • Hardware encoder built-in.

  • Can monitor real keyboard/mouse and mimic inputs.

  • USB timing/parameter tweaks possible.

Pros – B+/B Pro:

  • Python scripting support.

  • Acceptable input spoofing and control.

Cons:

  • Easier detected in major games like Fortnite, Valorant, and Faceit. (Compared to Makcu)

  • Bad "spoofing" (device emulation isn’t 1:1) causes mismatched descriptors and suspicious timing.

  • No USB passthrough—emulation only, with sloppy results and locked to 1kHz.

  • Higher price with hardware locking.

  • Community has largely abandoned it—ban reports are increasing.

  • Not open-source, and software is outdated.

Use Case:
Only viable if you’re stuck with an old setup and not touching any competitive anti-cheat-heavy titles. Good for legacy setups only.

Anti-Cheat Safety:
Highwe risk—frequent bans across EAC, BE, Faceit, and Val. Would not recommend for modern use.


Makcu

What is it?
An open-source aim device built on dual ESP32-S3 microcontrollers. Free firmware and a growing community. The new v3 firmware adds full USB passthrough.

Pros:

  • Dirt cheap buy pre-assembled.

  • Open-source with active dev support.

  • Fully working passthrough with v3 firmware—mimics your real mouse, not static values.

  • Zero hardware locking, no BS.

  • Blazing fast: 4 Mbps (CH343 UART) + 6 Mbps COM port.

  • Dual MCU design with tons of RAM and storage.

  • Clean RTOS code for multitasking and better performance.

Cons:

  • Passthrough works great—but not all mice are supported yet.
    (Logitech G Pro, Razer Viper/Death Adder work well. Open a ticket in our Discord for compatibility requests.)

Use Case:
Ideal for users who prioritize security and reliability without sacrificing performance. As long as your mouse is supported, MAKCU delivers powerful, safe, and continuously evolving functionality.

Anti-Cheat Safety:
Very safe currently on EAC, BE, Faceit, and Valorant.
v3 passthrough is a game changer for avoiding detection—way ahead of KM Box’s outdated emulation.


Final Thoughts:

Makcu blows KM Box out of the water.
KM Box is overpriced, outdated, and risky. Makcu’s open-source flexibility, real passthrough, and better safety make it the clear winner for 2025 and beyond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mr. Duck changed the title to What are the differences between our DMA aiming devices?
×
×
  • Create New...